水电界老前辈汪胡桢先生,从发展水利水电的前提出发,提出改革坝型和移民制度的建议(详见《中国水利》1983年3期27页),是非常中肯的。对于改革移民制度,结合新安江水库移民的实际,谈些个人的看法和意见。新安江水电站于1958年兴建,1960年4月第一台机组发电,同年9月并入华东电网,建设速度是非常快的。原设计规定移民24万多人,淹没土地31万多亩,每个移民迁移费预算478元,总费用1.13亿元;由于受当时的条件限制,受极左思想的影响,在移民上是有失误的。主要是着眼外迁,忽视后靠;着眼于农业的粮食生产,而忽视多种经营广开移民生产生活出路。结果移民费超过原指标,而库区105～108米高程内还有2～3万移民未迁走,估计仍需支出4000～5000万元才能彻底解决。由于至今还存在移 Mr. Wang Huzhen, an elder of the hydropower sector, proposed the proposal of reforming the dam type and immigration system from the premise of developing water conservancy and hydropower (see “China Water Conservancy” 1983-03, p. 27) and is very pertinent. For the reform of immigration system, combined with the actual Xin’anjiang Reservoir resettlement, talk about some personal opinions and opinions. Xin’anjiang Hydropower Station was built in 1958, and the first unit was built in April 1960 to generate electricity. In September the same year, it was incorporated into East China Power Grid. The construction speed was very fast. The original design stipulated that over 240,000 immigrants should be swallowed and more than 310,000 mu of land should be flooded. The resettlement budget of each immigrants is 478 yuan and the total cost is 113 million yuan. Due to the prevailing conditions, influenced by the ultra-leftist ideology, there are Mistakes Mainly focus on the relocation, ignoring the back by; focus on agricultural food production, while ignoring a variety of management to open a wide range of immigrants production and way of life. As a result, the resettlement fee exceeded the original target while there were still 2 to 30,000 immigrants who did not move away from the elevation of 105 to 108 meters in the reservoir area. It is estimated that they still need to spend 40-50 million yuan to completely solve this problem. As there is still moving