论文部分内容阅读
普列汉诺夫认为,首先要肯定人类历史发展的铁的必然性,其次才是在一定条件下发挥作用的人的主体能动性,主体能动性只有与社会发展的规律性相符合才能得到真正发挥。萨特对此提出质疑:既然一切都是铁的必然性,那人的存在还有何意义呢?萨特对普列汉诺夫哲学主体能动性思想的批判,虽然有我们不认可的部分,但他对人的主体能动性的强调,是具有一定的合理性的。在中华民族伟大复兴事业的历史进程中,在遵循客观规律性的同时,我们也要加入更多的主体能动性的元素。
Plekhanov believed that it is necessary to affirm the inevitability of iron in the development of human history in the first place and secondly the initiative of the people who play a role under certain conditions. Only when the initiative of the subject is consistent with the regularity of social development can they be truly played. Sartre questioned this: what is the meaning of human existence, since everything is iron? Sartre’s criticism of Plekhanov’s philosophical subject’s initiative, though it has something we disagree, Emphasis on the initiative of the human body, is a certain degree of rationality. In the historical course of the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, while following the objective laws, we must also include more elements of the initiative of the main body.