编辑部正在酝酿一期“关注”的内容。一日,阳光暖暖的午后,一位作者跨进《语文学习》编辑部的大门,在编辑们热情的招呼下落坐。寒暄几句后,他便提出:“考场套作积弊已深,此问题不解决,作文教学将走进死胡同!”众编辑立即纷纷“质疑”:考场套作不可避免,任何作文题都可以套作,只是程度大小而已。看起来,这位作者一时落了单,但他仍孤军奋战:“我回头出几个题目给你们看看,肯定套作不了。”于是,一场关于“套作”与“反套作”的“战斗”就此拉开序幕:一方是绞尽脑汁寻索题目的某作者,一方是摩拳擦掌准备应战的众编辑。 The editorial department is brewing a period of “concern”. One day, on a warm afternoon, an author stepped into the door of the “Learning” editorial department and sat down with the enthusiastic greetings of the editors. After greeting a few words, he put forward: “The examination room has become a long-standing problem. If this problem is not resolved, composition teaching will enter a dead end!” “The public editors immediately have questions”: the examination room is an unavoidable, any composition. Questions can be nested, but only degree of size. It seems that the author fell off a single moment, but he is still fighting alone: ​​“I look back at a few topics for you to see, surely can’t do anything.” So, there is a “crochet” and “Anti-jamming” “combats” kicked off: One side was the author who was racking his brain to find a topic, and one side was a public editor who was ready to fight.