论文部分内容阅读
正值明晰企业产权、建立现代企业制度的讨论此起彼伏之际,笔者发现了“囚犯的二难选择(Prisoner’s dilem-ma)”这一案例:有甲、乙二人同谋犯罪,被警察署拘留。在审讯过程中,警察明确地告诉二人可以在以下方案中作出选择:①两人都招供,各判刑10年;②如果一人招供,而另一人不招供,当局规定,招供的人属于“坦白从宽”,判刑5年;不招的人属于“抗拒从严”,判予枪毙。当然,二人都明白,他们还有第三种选择,即如果两人都不招供,结果造成证据不足,无法定刑,二人都被释放。
At a time when discussions on the definition of corporate property rights and the establishment of a modern enterprise system were taking place one after another, the author discovered the case of “Prisoner’s dilemma”: A and B persons were conspiring to commit crimes and were detained by the police. During the interrogation process, the police clearly told the two to choose between: 1 Both confessed and each sentenced to 10 years; 2 If one person confessed and the other did not confess, the authorities stipulated that the confessed person was “confessed From width, sentenced to 5 years of imprisonment; people who did not recruit belonged to “resistance to strictness” and were sentenced to execution. Of course, both of them understand that they still have a third option, that is, if both of them do not confess, the result is insufficient evidence and they cannot be sentenced. Both are released.