论文部分内容阅读
明代的宋史研究有着特殊的时代背景,学者虽受儒家正统论和大一统史学观念的影响,个别史家为引古筹今、张扬本朝统治威仪,尤其注重以纪年区分正闰的政治意义,从而在宋史著述中彻底改变元修宋、辽、金三史各为正统的格局。这种偏执夷夏之辨的编纂思想在历史发展与社会文明已然大大前进了的明代,与更多进步学者所拥有的开阔认识和进步史观形成了鲜明的对比,并遭到其尖锐的批评。在历史大潮的冲击下,明代更多的宋史学者开始站在历史主义的立场反思宋、辽、金、元的历史,不但体现了明代史学的进步,亦在历史文化层面反映了中华民族多元一体融合发展的客观趋势。
The study of the Song Dynasty in the Ming Dynasty had a special background of the times. Although scholars were influenced by the Confucian orthodoxy and the concept of unification of the unification, individual historians raised the pretext for the introduction of the Former Government and especially emphasized the political significance of distinguishing the positive since the official year, Thus in the history of the Song Dynasty revolution completely changed Yuan repair Song, Liao, Jin three history of each for the orthodox pattern. This Ming Dynasty, in which the historical thinking and the social civilization of the patriarchal ideology was sharply advanced, stood sharply in contrast with the open-mindedness and progressive history possessed by more progressive scholars and was sharply criticized . Under the impact of the historical tide, more scholars of the Song Dynasty in the Ming Dynasty started to reflect on the history of the Song, Liao, Jin and Yuan from the standpoint of the historicism. This not only reflected the progress of the historiography of the Ming Dynasty but also reflected the diversity of the Chinese nation The integration of the development of the objective trend.