本文以宇文所安教授在其所著的《中国文论:英译与评论》一书中对《二十四诗品·自然》的评论为例,具体从道家哲学的“自然”观、古典文艺理论中的“自然”论以及文论家眼中的“自然”文学这三个方面来就宇文所安对《二十四诗品·自然》的误读进行分析。 This article takes professor Yuwen Suan’s comment on “Twenty-four Poems and Nature” in his book “Chinese Literary Criticism: English Translation and Criticism” as an example, specifically from the view of “nature” of Taoist philosophy, The “natural” theory in the theory of literature and art and the “natural” literature in the eyes of the literary theorists make an analysis of the misunderstanding Uygur’s “twenty-four poems and nature”.