交通碰瓷行为可分为无中生有型和颠倒黑白型两种类型,前者的不法集中体现于索财行为,而后者的违法性同时表现在索财行为和制造交通事故的行为上。制造交通事故的行为能否构成以危险方法危害公共安全罪,取决于其危害公共安全的程度是否足以与四种危险方法相当。此外,该行为还可能构成故意毁坏财物罪。索财行为的定性需要综合考察行为人取得财产的方式、欺骗的内容与程度、索取数额是否合理以及有无胁迫行为等因素。在被害人交付财产的场合,若行为人的欺骗行为能为其索财行为提供法律上的正当依据,索财行为构成诈骗罪;否则,应将其认定为敲诈勒索罪。 Traffic collision porcelain behavior can be divided into non-innate type and upside down black and white type, the former is not concentrated in the unscrupulous financial behavior, while the latter’s illegality is also reflected in the behavior of money-making and the manufacture of traffic accidents. Whether the conduct of a traffic accident constitutes a crime of endangering public safety by a dangerous method depends on whether the extent of its endangerment of public safety is sufficiently comparable to the four dangerous methods. In addition, the act may constitute a crime of intentional destruction of property. Qualitative analysis of the behavior of the money needs a comprehensive examination of the way the perpetrator acquired property, the content and extent of deception, whether the amount requested is reasonable and whether the coercive behavior and other factors. Where the victim delivers the property, if the perpetrator’s deception can provide legal justification for his acts of money, the acts of money constitute fraud; otherwise he shall be deemed as extortion.