我国政府今日之教育方针,为“理论与实际一致”。但在大学中教课,欲贯澈“理论与实际一致”之目标,却非容易之事。就分析化学而论,虽然在实验室中所做实验,与在教室内所讲理论,互相引证;即用实验来证明论理之真实,用理论来解释实验的所以然之故,似乎已可达到理论与实际之一致。但是,学生在学校实验室中所做的实验,与其毕业后到工厂中(或其他机关中)实际上所遇到的问题,往往不能一致。盖无论何种课程,自有其一定系统,一定范围;即我在复旦所教之高等分析一科,虽曾将各式各样的分析方法,尽力搜罗,但总不能包罗万象,一无遗漏。因此,我对于毕业生出去,常嘱其将来在分析工作上,如有困难问题,不 The education policy of our government today is “the same in theory and practice.” However, it is not an easy task to teach at the university and to pursue the goal of “integrating theory with practice”. In terms of analytical chemistry, although the experiment done in the laboratory and the theory in the classroom cite each other; that is, to prove the truth of the experiment by experiments and to explain the experiment by theory, it seems that the theory can be reached In line with the actual. However, the students’ experiments in school laboratories often can not be consistent with the problems they actually encounter after they graduate to the factory (or other institutions). Covering whatever course you have, it has its own system, a certain range; that is, I have taught a class of higher analysis in Fudan University. Although I have tried my best to collect a wide range of analytical methods, I can not cover everything with no gaps. Therefore, I go out for graduates and often ask them for analysis in the future. If there are any difficulties, they will not