论文部分内容阅读
1994年11月的选举结果,使工作与福利相关联的重要性得以强调。这已由贝利卡·布莱克和帕特丽夏·鲁格勒斯指出过;他们最近要求公众注意美国的AFDC的再接受模式。他们指出:由于收入提高而中止AFDC期的妇女,再接受率达25％;他们也发现,进入劳动力市场的关键时期为放弃福利待遇后6—9个月的期间。本文进一步分析以期找出家庭和工作因素对再接受比率的影响。 已有证据表明,家庭历史能影响到福利的接受。罗伯特·摩菲特(1992年)已指出,虽
The outcome of the November 1994 election highlighted the importance of linking work to well-being. This has been pointed out by Berik Black and Patricia Rugelers; they have recently called public attention to the receptivity pattern of AFDC in the United States. They point out that the acceptance rate of 25% for women who discontinued their AFDC due to their income increase also found that the key period for entering the labor market was 6-9 months after giving up their benefits. This article is further analyzed to find out the impact of family and work factors on re-acceptance rates. There is evidence that family history can affect the acceptance of welfare. Robert Moffitt (1992) has pointed out that though