对马恩有关文艺与意识形态关系理论的再认识——兼与董学文的有关观点商榷

来源 :浙江树人大学学报(人文社会科学版) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:shi893932393
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
笼统地把文艺视为意识形态,或认为文艺是与意识形态相适应的社会意识形式,具意识形态性,都把文艺泛意识形态化。这些观点既不符合马克思《政治经济学批判序言》的原意,也不符合中外文学史的实际。马克思在《序言》中明确把文艺视为一定基础上的社会意识形式,其中部分属于意识形态文艺。文学史上存在着大量的非意识形态文艺和带意识形态性文艺。马克思关于意识形态和自由的精神生产区别的观点,说明应使意识形态文艺和自由生产的文艺并行不悖的发展。 Generally speaking, literature and art are regarded as ideologies, or literature and arts are social ideologies that are compatible with ideology. They are all ideological and pan-conscious literary formations. These views neither accord with the original intention of Marx’s “Preamble of Political Economics Criticism,” nor accord with the reality of the history of Chinese and foreign literature. Marx clearly defined literature and art as a certain form of social consciousness in the Preface, some of which belonged to ideological literature and art. There are a lot of non-ideological literature and art and ideological literature and art in the history of literature. Marx’s point of view on the difference between the spiritual production of ideology and freedom shows that the development of ideological literature and art and the free production of literature and art should go hand in hand.
其他文献
针对煤化工装置对气体产品的新要求,从流程选择、优化、节能和安全供气等方面对大型化工型内压缩流程空分设备进行了研究;指出:合理选择单套空分设备规模,发挥多套空分设备联