许多书上都讲,做思想政治工作要晓之以理,动之以情,明之以法,导之以行。但在实际工作中,人们又常常受到四者之间相互矛盾的困扰,例如:“合情不合理”、“合理不合情”、“合法不合情”等等,究竟四者之间存在什么样的关系?这些关系又如何把握才能最大限度的发挥思想政治工作的威力呢?我试谈一下本人粗浅的看法和见解。我认为“情、理、法”三者之间存在着对立统一关系。因此,我们必须辩证的认识和处理三者之间的矛盾。应当承认,企业的大多数政策和规定是合情合理的,但是由于不同时期有不同范畴的“情”,而“理”和“法”又都是在实践过程中逐步形成的。所以,具体的讲,情无不变之情,理无绝对之理,法无完美之法,三者都有各自的可变性和不完全性。这样就决定了它们之间的矛盾性,在一般情况下, Many books have said that to do ideological and political work, we must be sensible, move with emotion, be clear about the law, and guide it. However, in practical work, people are often plagued by contradictions between the four, such as: “irrational and irrational”, “reasonable and unreasonable”, “legally unreasonable,” and so on. What is the difference between the four? How can these relations be grasped in order to maximize the power of ideological and political work? I would like to talk about my shallow views and opinions. I think that there is a unity of opposites between “emotion, reason, and law.” Therefore, we must dialectically understand and handle the contradiction between the three. It should be acknowledged that most of the company’s policies and regulations are reasonable, but because there are different categories of “emotions” in different periods, “rationalism” and “law” are gradually formed in the course of practice. Therefore, in concrete terms, there is no absolute reason for feelings and emotions, and there is no perfect method for law. All three have their own variability and incompleteness. This determines the contradiction between them, and in general,