论文部分内容阅读
在当今的司法程序中越来越多地应用科学技术来证明争议事实,但这种应用也存在一些争议和问题。有关证据和证明程序规则的存在,在本质上,并没有同科学证据的应用和采纳在任何方式上存在冲突。相反,如果存在非认知性的程序规则,其结果是这样的规则应该被撤销。除了物理、化学、工程学和遗传学等“解释性科学”得以广泛应用之外,心理学、社会学、历史学、人类学和人类文化学等“理解性科学”也逐渐在司法程序中开始应用。关于法庭科学证据的可靠性存在多种多样的问题,当新的法庭科学证据获取方法被发现和采用时,如果它们不遵循科学有效性的标准,那么它们将不能在司法程序中被采信为证据。
In today’s judicial process, science and technology are increasingly used to prove the facts of the dispute, but there are also some controversies and problems in this application. The existence of the relevant rules of evidence and proof of procedure does not in any way conflict with the application and adoption of scientific evidence in essence. Conversely, if non-cognizant rules of procedure exist, the result is that such rules should be revoked. In addition to the widespread use of “interpretive sciences” such as physics, chemistry, engineering and genetics, psychology, sociology, history, anthropology and anthropology and other “science of understanding” Judicial proceedings began to apply. There are a variety of issues regarding the reliability of forensic scientific evidence, and when new methods of obtaining scientific forensic evidence are discovered and adopted, they will not be admitted as evidence in the judicial process if they do not follow the criteria of scientific validity .