财产性利益具备财产特征,能够给行为人带来实际经济利益,完全可以成为贪污贿赂犯罪的对象,但新司法解释仅仅确认其属于贿赂犯罪中的“财物”范畴,未确认其属于贪污犯罪的对象,不利于指导司法实践。不仅对行为性质的正确认定造成影响,也对犯罪形态、犯罪数额的界定带来困惑。 Property interests have the property characteristics, can bring practical economic benefits to the perpetrators, can become the object of corruption and bribery, but the new judicial interpretation only confirms that it belongs to the category of “property” in the crime of bribery, did not confirm that it belongs to corruption The object of crime is not conducive to directing judicial practice. Not only affects the correct identification of the nature of behavior, but also confused the definition of criminal patterns and the amount of crime.