汪师韩《孙文志疑》提出的“孙樵古文伪作”说存在重大缺陷,这一观点没有版本依据,从汪师韩所谓伪作中可以考查孙樵行迹,且汪师韩未能较为合适地评论这些作品的艺术成就。然而,汪师韩精研孙樵作品,对孙樵研究也做出过巨大贡献,具体表现在注释成就很高,对其所认定的孙樵作品的艺术成就认识深刻,具有较高的学术价值。 Wang Shikhan’s “Sun Wenzhi’s Doubt” proposed that there are major flaws in the “Fallacy of Sun Qiao’s Ancient Prose.” There is no version basis for this view. From Wang Shih-han’s so-called fake works, we can examine the work of Sun Qiao and Wang Shirong fails to comment more appropriately on the art of these works achievement. However, Wang Shiyan elaborated Sun Qiao’s works and made great contributions to the study of Sun Qiao. This is reflected in the high achievement of annotations and deep understanding of the artistic achievements of Sun Qiao’s works, which is of high academic value.