论文部分内容阅读
确定不能犯的印象理论与重大无知说虽然简单明了,但从理论基础上看存在先天不足;具体危险说从一般人观点虚拟法益的危险性,虽然强调其来自重视法益客观危险的客观未遂理论,但其所认定的法益危险,其实来自一般人的共通意识,如果这个共通意识与现实客观情况不同,就会发生明明不可能损害法益,但具体危险说认定有危险的结论。为此,有必要坚持彻底的客观危险说立场,即就表现于外部的行为在事后从客观上进行考察,如果行为具有导致结果发生的危险性就是未遂,否则是不能犯。从事后观点判断有无危险的具体操作方式是:首先,从所有已知的事实中,找出无法满足既遂构成要件的关键因素。其次,视关键因素是否属行为人无法控制的随机事件。如果是,则关键因素属于防止结果发生的变项,这时必须再决定,该变项是否可能以导致结果发生的变项的方式出现,从而损害法益。最后,审视“致果变项”作用的时、空关系,该作用必须发生于原犯罪流程的着手后至最终效果完成前,也必须是原犯罪处所的相同或紧邻地域。如果能肯定其时空关系,则个案中有事后危险,可判断属于相对不能的障碍未遂。
Although the theory of impossibility and the theory of ignorance that can not be committed are simple and straightforward, they are inherently deficient from the theoretical point of view. Although the danger of the virtual legal interest from the viewpoint of the common people is emphasized, it is emphasized that it comes from the objective attempt theory that emphasizes the objective danger of legal interest The recognized legal interests of danger, in fact, come from the common sense of the average person, if the common sense and the reality of the objective situation is different, there will be obviously impossible to damage the legal interests, but the specific danger that the risk of the conclusion. For this reason, it is necessary to persist in a completely objective and dangerous position that objectively examines ex post behavior externally and that an act can not be committed if the act poses a risk of causing the result to be an attempt. From the point of view to determine whether the danger of the specific mode of operation is: First, from all known facts, find out the key elements of the incident can not meet the requirements. Second, depending on whether the key factor is a random event beyond the control of the perpetrator. If so, the key factor is a variable that prevents the outcome from occurring, at which time it must be decided again whether the variable can appear as a variable that leads to the outcome, thereby compromising the law. Finally, looking at the temporal-spatial relationship of the “consequential” effect must occur from the time of the original criminal process to the completion of the final effect, and must also be the same or immediately adjacent to the original criminal space. If you can affirm the relationship between space and time, then there are exigencies in the case of dangerous, can determine the relative failure of the failure can not be.