论文部分内容阅读
20世纪后半叶兴起的文化研究对形式主义、结构主义以及西方经验中的“欧洲中心主义”、“男权主义”、“技术进步的价值观”等进行批判,传统社会科学对结构及普遍规律的探求也备受质疑。然而值得注意的是,一些神话作品和畅销的推理小说因为具有“反传统”的荒诞无稽及其对传统社会科学的嘲弄戏谑而被冠以“文化研究的思路”,致使这一领域诸多概念被滥用。从人类学的角度对文化研究的诸多概念加以厘清,认为文化研究强调经验的反思(empiricalreflexivity)的重要性,反思的目的是拓展理论的深度和实践性。
Cultural Studies Emerging in the Latter Half of the 20th Century Criticized the Formalism, Structuralism, and Western Experiences of “Eurocentrism,” “Patriarchalism,” and “Values of Technological Progress,” and so on. Traditional social sciences have followed the principles of structure and universality The quest is also highly questioned. However, it is worth noting that some mythological works and best-selling inference fiction have been branded “ideas of cultural studies” for their absurdity of “anti-traditional” and their mockery of traditional social sciences, resulting in many concepts in this field being abuse. From the perspective of anthropology, many concepts of cultural studies are clarified. Cultural studies emphasize the importance of empirical reflection and the purpose of reflection is to expand the depth and practicality of the theory.