论文部分内容阅读
胡适对五四背景进行了具体分析,指出五四不是一件孤立的事,他将五四定性为青年学生的爱国运动,对其意义给予充分肯定。胡适认为五四运动与新文化运动各自独立存在,又有着非常密切的关系,他对两者关系的评说与分析非常独特,意识到五四对促进新文化运动具有永久的历史意义,同时又从其本人固有的文艺复兴观点出发,将五四运动视作整个文化运动中一项历史性的政治干扰。胡适对五四的思考与论说为我们理解五四提供了一重不可或缺的“面相”与“方向”。
Hu Shi analyzed the background of the May 4th Movement in a concrete way and pointed out that the May Fourth incident was not an isolated issue. He defined the May Fourth Movement as a patriotic movement for young students and fully affirmed its significance. Hu Shih considered that the May 4th Movement and the New Culture Movement existed independently and had very close relations with each other. His commentary and analysis on the relationship between the two were very unique. He realized that the May Fourth Movement had a permanent historical significance in promoting the New Culture Movement, From his own Renaissance point of view, he considered the May Fourth Movement as a historic political disturbance in the entire cultural movement. Hu Shi’s thinking and theory on the May 4th Movement provided an indispensable “face” and “direction” to our understanding of the May Fourth Movement.