论文部分内容阅读
把反映论作为文心雕龙研究的方法或思维准则,这是纵贯王元化学术后半生的重要现象。从1962年初撰《明诗篇山水诗兴起说柬释》,把刘勰“庄老告退,而山水方滋”硬拗成“唯心告退,而唯物方滋”始,到1979年初版《文心雕龙创作论》将如上《柬释》弃为佚文;再到1992年修订版《文心雕龙讲疏》对1979年版作“去阶级分析”、“去偶像语式”、“去规律标签”;直至2008年“临终对话”未忘其龙学著述仍留着反映论尾巴——前后竟近半世纪之久。由此可鉴西学与中国文学的百年错位之历史成因之一,当源自前苏联理论模式对中国学术的深刻负效应。
Taking the theory of reflection as a method or thinking criterion for the study of Diao Wenxian, this is an important phenomenon in the metaphase of Wang Yuanhua. From the beginning of 1962, he wrote “Interpretation of Poems on Landscape Poems” from the beginning of the “Poetry of the Ming Dynasty” to Liu Shui “ Wen Xin Diao Long creation theory ”will be“ Cambodian ”discarded as a lost text; to 1992 revised version of“ Wen Xin Diao Long Shu ”on the 1979 edition for“ to class analysis ”,“ to idol language Until 2008, ”DIALOGUE" has not forgotten that the study of the dragon still retains the tail of the reflection theory - almost half a century ago. Therefore, one of the historical causes of the misplaced history of Western culture and Chinese literature can be deduced from the profound negative effect of the theoretical model of the former Soviet Union on Chinese academia.