论文部分内容阅读
住宅是一个人心灵的安居所,我国宪法第三十九条规定:“中华人民共和国公民的住宅不受侵犯。禁止非法搜查或非法侵入公民的住宅。”但我国现有司法解释中,只有最高人民法院《关于审理抢劫、抢夺刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》中对“户”进行了定义,却缺少对“住宅”的法律性释义。而对于“非法侵入他人住宅”的“非法”在认定上也容易产生争议。同时“侵入手段”也值得考虑,例如运用工具替代人身进入他人住宅的行为该如何认定。最后本罪的正当防卫也值得推敲。本文旨在通过对以上问题进行初步探析,为本罪的详细解释提供参考。
Residential is a spiritual home, and Article 39 of our Constitution states: “The residences of citizens of the People’s Republic of China shall not be violated, and illegal searches or unlawful intrusion into the houses of citizens shall be prohibited.” However, in our current judicial interpretation, Only the Opinion of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Robbery and Robbing Criminal Cases defines the “household” but lacks the legal interpretation of “residence.” And the “illegal” for “illegal intrusion of someone else’s dwelling house” is also prone to controversy. At the same time “means of invasion ” is also worth considering, such as the use of tools to replace the body into the residence of others how to identify. Finally, the legitimate defense of this crime is also worth considering. The purpose of this paper is to provide a reference for the detailed explanation of this crime through preliminary analysis of the above problems.