明李诩《戒庵老人漫笔》载明初讳元事,有云: 余家先世分关中,写吴元年,洪武元年,俱不用元字,想国初恶胜国之号而避之,故民间相习如此。史书无所考见,姑记之以询之熟典故者焉。这是明初讳元说的最早记载。按李公此说,即以明初讳元系因追恨元朝而起。这一结论, 稍后的沈德符于其所著《万历野获编》中稍事补苴,进而认为明初因恨元而讳用元字正“如南宋写金字俱作今字,…则又不共戴天仇也”。从而似在逻辑上为李说提供了新的注脚。入清,王应奎《柳南随笔》亦有与李、沈二人近乎相同的记载。 There are Ming Yu 诩 “Annihilation of the old man Man Mo” contained in the early Ming Yuan taboo, there is a cloud: more than world class in the customs, writing Wu Yuan years, Hongwu first year, all without meticulous, So do each other. No history of the book to see, a record of the Code of Cooked sake of the deceased. This is the earliest record of early Ming taboo element. According to Lee said this, that is due to the Ming Dynasty taboo yuan hate Yuan Dynasty. This conclusion, later Shen De-fu in his book “Wanli wild series” a slight recapitulation, and then that the early Ming Dynasty because of hate yuan and taboo with the word is “such as the Southern Song Dynasty to write the word for the current word, ... then do not have common hatred also ”. This seems to logically provide Lee with a new footnote. Clear, Wang Yingkui “Liu Nan Essay” There are almost the same records with Lee and Shen two.