论文部分内容阅读
在线索核查、立案、侦查、审查起诉、审判、执行等环节,为案件当事人请托说情的行为都是实践中比较典型的违法干预办案行为。这种行为不仅直接妨碍了具体案件的依法公正处理,也严重损害了司法的公信力,是一种看得见的干预。另一种干预则是“非典型干预”。在河北邢台,一起涉嫌合同诈骗案的受害人张献彬就遇到了“非典型干预”司法的事情,即案件的侦破因有关部门的消极而阻滞。“嫌疑人刘某、朱某、张某原系邢台县凯
In catenary verification, filing, investigation, examination and prosecution, trial and execution, the act of asking and holding the case for the clients is a typical act of illegal intervention in practice. Such behavior not only directly impedes the fair handling of cases according to law, but also seriously damages the credibility of the judiciary. It is an invisible intervention. Another intervention is ”atypical intervention “. In Xingtai, Hebei, Zhang Xianbin, a victim of the alleged contract fraud, has encountered the issue of ”atypical intervention“ and ”judicial intervention“, in which case the detection of a case is blocked by the negative of the relevant departments. ”Suspect Liu, Zhu, Zhang original Xingtai County Kai