世界贸易组织争端解决机制具有既往不咎的特点和价值取向。裁决执行程序,是该制度的重要组成部分,它强化了争端解决机制,既体现了多边制度的特点,又体现了正当程序原则。其中,“21.5专家组程序”处理对被诉方实施措施的争议,目前该程序规则与原争端解决专家组程序规则的关系不尽完善和明确。该程序专家组的权限范围不同于原始专家组。“22.6仲裁程序”处理申诉方的报复程度。报复是迫使申诉方履行裁决的一种临时措施。现有规则的模糊性使得仲裁员可以就实施措施的违法性作出裁决,这样的裁决没有其他程序的审查。仲裁员对报复程度的裁决有一定的武断性。 The dispute settlement mechanism of the World Trade Organization has the same characteristics and value orientation as before. The ruling process is an important part of the system. It strengthens the dispute settlement mechanism, embodies the characteristics of the multilateral system and reflects the principle of due process. Among them, the “21.5 Panel Procedure” deals with the dispute over the measures taken by the respondent, and the relationship between the procedural rules and the rules of the original Dispute Settlement Expert Panel is not perfect and clear at present. The procedural expert group has a different competence than the original expert group. “22.6 Arbitration Procedure” to deal with the complainant’s degree of retaliation. Retaliation is a temporary measure that compels the complainant to enforce the award. The ambiguity of the existing rules allows arbitrators to rule on the illegality of the enforcement measures, which are not reviewed by other proceedings. Arbitrators have a certain degree of arbitrariness on the degree of reprisal.