论文部分内容阅读
实现自由竞争的体制和保障消费者的福利,是欧共体竞争法的立法主旨。与《欧共体条约》第81条相比,第82条主要规制支配企业的单方滥用行为。不可否认,该条文内容过于简单,内涵模糊,在实践中缺乏明确的指南。然而,欧盟委员会和欧洲法院通过一系列司法判例、相关判决和指南等方式,对其适用的边界进行了解释和澄清。这在2009年英特尔反垄断案中得以体现。我国的立法部门应当借鉴欧盟的做法,尽快颁布反垄断法关于精确界定市场支配地位滥用的实施细则。
The system of free competition and the protection of consumers’ welfare are the legislative thrusts of the EC competition law. Compared with Article 81 of the EC Treaty, Article 82 mainly regulates unilateral abuse of an enterprise. Undeniably, the content of the article is too simple, ambiguous, lack of clear guidelines in practice. However, the European Commission and the European Court of Justice have interpreted and clarified their applicable borders through a series of judicial precedents, judgments and guides. This is reflected in the 2009 Intel antitrust case. Our legislative department should learn from the EU’s approach and promulgate as soon as possible the anti-monopoly law on the precise definition of the dominant position abuse of the implementation details.