论文部分内容阅读
目的:对连续性血液透析滤过与间歇性血液透析治疗肾衰竭的临床效果进行分析研究。方法:选取于2013年2月-2015年4月期间在我院接受血液透析治疗的42例肾衰竭患者,根据不同的血液透析方法将患者随机分为对照组和治疗组进行对照研究,观察并比较间歇性血液透析与连续性血液透析滤过的临床治疗效果。结果:经过不同方式的治疗后,两组患者的心率、SCr、BUN均有了不同程度的下降,治疗组患者的心率、SCr、BUN均显著低于对照组,差异显著,治疗有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:连续性血液透析滤过治疗肾衰竭的临床效果显著优于间歇性血液透析,能够使患者的心率、SCr、BUN显著降低,安全有效,值得在临床实践中进行推广应用。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of continuous hemodiafiltration and intermittent hemodialysis on renal failure. Methods: Forty-two patients with renal failure undergoing hemodialysis in our hospital from February 2013 to April 2015 were selected and randomly divided into control group and treatment group according to different hemodialysis methods. Comparison of intermittent hemodialysis and continuous hemodiafiltration clinical treatment. Results: The heart rate, SCr and BUN of the two groups decreased to some extent after different treatment. The heart rate, SCr and BUN in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group, the difference was significant, the treatment was statistically significant (P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Continuous hemodiafiltration is superior to intermittent hemodialysis in treatment of renal failure, which can significantly reduce heart rate, SCr and BUN, and is safe and effective. It is worth to be popularized in clinical practice.