论文部分内容阅读
美国的公众史学运动在法国引发了一些理论上的反思,也取得了一定的实践成绩,但并没有造成更大的影响。究其原因,主要与法国史学自身的公共传统和年鉴——新文化史传统有着密切的关联。在历史研究的认识论和方法论上,这两种传统与公众史学的主张有着许多相似之处,但也存在差别。此外,法国划分研究型硕士和职业型硕士这样一种制度设计,也在一定程度上解决了历史学的基础研究与实际应用之间的矛盾。
The public history movement in the United States triggered some theoretical reflections in France and also achieved some practical results, but it did not cause any further impact. The reason is mainly closely related to the public tradition of French historiography and the yearbook-new culture history tradition. In the epistemology and methodology of historical research, there are many similarities between these two traditions and those of public historiography, but there are also differences. In addition, France’s division of research master and professional master such a system design, but also to some extent to solve the history of basic research and practical application of contradictions.