论文部分内容阅读
目的分析人工膝关节置换围术期规范化疼痛管理的临床效果。方法以该院在2014年2月—2016年2月收治的98例人工膝关节置换术患者作为研究对象。将其分为A组与B组。A组47例,B组51例。其中,A组利用围术期常规护理模式,B组在A组基础上,进行围术期规范化疼痛管理。利用VAS评分(视觉模拟评分法)对比二组的镇痛效果,并对比护理满意度。结果 B组的VAS评分明显低于A组,其中,B组VAS评分<3分(镇痛效果较好)的患者为46例,占总数的90.20%,A组VAS评分<3分(镇痛效果较好)的患者为30例,占总数的63.83%,二组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。B组的护理满意度为94.12%,A组的护理满意度为87.23%,二组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对人工膝关节置换术患者进行围术期的规范化疼痛管理,可以有效减轻患者的疼痛感,提高镇痛效果,并具有很高的护理满意度,可在临床中加以推广。
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of standardized pain management during perioperative knee arthroplasty. Methods A total of 98 patients undergoing artificial knee arthroplasty in our hospital from February 2014 to February 2016 were enrolled in this study. Divided into A group and B group. A group of 47 cases, B group of 51 cases. Among them, group A used routine perioperative nursing mode, and group B performed perioperative standardized pain management on the basis of group A. The VAS score (visual analogue scale) was used to compare the analgesic effects of the two groups and the nursing satisfaction was compared. Results The VAS score of group B was significantly lower than that of group A. 46 of them had VAS score <3 (the analgesic effect was better) in group B, accounting for 90.20% of the total. The VAS score of group A was <3 (analgesia Better effect), 30 patients, accounting for 63.83% of the total, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). The satisfaction rate of nursing in group B was 94.12%, and that in group A was 87.23%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Perioperative standardized management of pain in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty can effectively relieve the pain and improve the analgesic effect of patients with high pain satisfaction. It can be widely used clinically.