在擂肥时反遭被害学生围攻殴打的情况下,被告人陈甲客观方面的行为仅仅是喊了一句“刘乙,搞……”这句话与刘乙拿刀乱捅导致一死三伤之间有无因果关系,陈甲是否应当承担刑事责任,本文从证据、这句话的真实意图、刘乙动刀的目的、喊叫与动刀的先后顺序等方面作了分析。另外,从被害方有明显过错、有关部门失职、陈甲还有酌情从宽处罚情节进行了辩护。 Under the circumstance of beating against the bereaved students by bereavement, the objective act of defendant Chen Chen merely shouted "Liu Yi, There is no cause-effect relationship between injuries, whether Chen Jia should bear the criminal responsibility. This article analyzes the evidence, the true intention of the sentence, the purpose of Liu Yi’s move, the order of shouting and moving the knife. In addition, there were obvious mistakes from the victimized party and the relevant departments dereliction of duty. Chen Jia also defended the circumstances of the leniency penalty at his discretion.