论文部分内容阅读
朗科诉美欲将“维权”进行到底朗科为什么和“维权”二字较上了劲?胜算究竟有多大?到“客场”是否变得水土不服?这一系列的问题使这场境外 IT 发明专利维权第一案成为了社会各界关注的焦点。在先后把华旗和索尼推上被告席之后,郎科在维权路上开始越走越远。经过一年零三个月的谋划,郎科再次出手,只是这次一贯以“主场作战”为主的朗科,将目光瞄向了远在美国的“客场”。2006年2月16日,深圳市朗科科技有限公司(简称“朗科公司”)在北京宣布,该公司已于美国东部时间2006年
Langke v. The United States want to “rights” in the end why Netac and “rights” word more? Winning exactly how much? To “away” become acclimatized? This series of issues to the foreign IT invention patents The first case of rights protection has become the focus of all walks of life. After Huaqi and Sony have successively pushed the defendant’s seat, Langke started to walk farther and farther in the path of safeguarding his rights. After a year and three months of planning, Langke shot again, but this has always been to “home-based combat,” the Netac, will look far in the United States, “away.” February 16, 2006, Shenzhen Netac Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Netac”) announced in Beijing, the company has been in the United States Eastern Time 2006