论文部分内容阅读
本文比较了依那普利与硝本地平治疗高血压的疗效。所有病倒在治疗前均停药2wk，依那普利组5～10mg／d,qd；硝苯地平组10～20mg／次，bid或tid。疗程4wk。结果显示：二级总有效率分别为93．7％和93．8％，无显著性差异（p＞0．05）．但降压幅度，二组存在显著差异，依那普利组显著优于硝本平，治疗期间前者未见明显副作用，后者可出现头痛、乏力、心悸、头晕、便秘等剧作用。
This article compares the efficacy of enalapril with nitrendipine in the treatment of hypertension. All patients fell ill before treatment were treated 2wk, enalapril group 5 ~ 10mg / d, qd; nifedipine group 10 ~ 20mg / time, bid or tid. Treatment 4wk. The results showed that the secondary total effective rates were 93.7% and 93.8% respectively, with no significant difference (p> 0.05). However, there was significant difference between the two groups. The enalapril group was significantly better than nitrendipine. There was no obvious side-effect during the treatment, which could lead to headache, fatigue, palpitation, dizziness and constipation.