我国共犯制度为参与犯设定了“主从关系”处罚原则,其实践逻辑为“以共同所犯之罪的法定刑罚幅度为参照系,以在共犯过程中的作用大小为调整基准,最终按照从犯必减的参与犯刑罚等级预设确定各共犯人所应受的具体惩罚”。这一原则的两个贯彻前提在实践中都面临不可化解的难题:共同所犯罪名确定困境使参与犯刑罚的具体裁量失去了参照系;参与者之间主从地位不明则造成调整基准的缺失。有必要比较并且借鉴参与犯处罚原则设定的“个别化”模式和“同等处罚”模式,对其进行反思和完善。 The system of accomplice in China has set the principle of “master-slave relationship” for the participants, and the practical logic is that “the reference range of the statutory penalty for the crime committed jointly is the reference system, and the size of the role in the process of accomplices as the adjustment basis , And finally according to the offender must be reduced by the level of participation in the penalty to determine the preconditions of the total punishment of prisoners should be subject to ”. The two prerequisites of this principle are faced with insurmountable problems in practice: the common predicament of convicted offender makes the specific discretion of sentencing penalty lost its frame of reference; . It is necessary to compare and draw lessons from the “individualization” mode and “equal punishment” mode set by the participation penalty principle to reflect and perfect it.