论文部分内容阅读
技术叙事包含双重含义:人们在日常生活中通过技术展开文化实践;技术史家的写作实践,它们分别对应日常知识和专家知识。文章以现象学为指引,以论述二者在实践层面的可通达与统一性为出发点,比较分析了各种不同技术叙事模式及其历史意义的建构方式。进而以关于惠特尼的不同历史叙事模式为例,比较分析了不同技术叙事模式通过不同的隐喻与情节化组合以现实化历史意义的方式,以此深入讨论叙事的情节化机制,从而展示了技术叙事的本体论、认知、审美与政治维度。由此,文章展现了对技术叙事进行文化研究的不同侧面与文化研究路径。
The technical narrative contains two meanings: people practice cultural practices through technology in daily life; and writers practice with technological historians, which correspond to daily knowledge and expert knowledge respectively. Taking phenomenology as the guideline, this paper starts with the discussion of the accessibility and unity of the two in practical aspects, and compares and analyzes the different modes of technical narration and the construction methods of their historical significance. Taking the different historical narrative patterns of Whitney as an example, this paper comparatively analyzes the ways in which different technical narrative patterns are combined with different metaphors and plots to realize the historical significance, so that the narrative episode mechanism can be further discussed, Ontology, Cognition, Aesthetic and Political Dimensions of Technical Narration. As a result, the article shows different aspects of cultural studies of technical narratives and cultural studies.