论文部分内容阅读
苔丝悲剧一直被认为是命运悲剧、性格悲剧和社会悲剧。这些观点忽视历史语境对个体的影响,忽视历史语境不是价值中立的真空,而是成员之间的关系受到物质生活的生产方式影响的人群。在文明社会里,个体被内心世界的需要和物质文化生产再生产过程中的内在需要的矛盾塑造着。矛盾的结果不是物质文化生产再生产方式的个性化,而是个体成为生活方式的工具。在这个过程中,个体不完全是被动的,个体能动性表现在个体或者选择泯灭个性,保存肉体;或者选择保存个体,消灭肉体。苔丝的认亲、饲养家禽和挤牛奶的职业过程以及离开亚雷家,吐露真情和亲手杀死亚雷个体认知过程表明生活方式以及在生活方式之中相互消融的政治、经济和文化对个体的影响,表明个体内心世界的需要和物质文化生产再生产过程中的内在需要的矛盾是悲剧根源。
Tess tragedy has always been considered a tragedy of tragedy, tragedy of personality and social tragedy. These views ignore the influence of historical context on individuals and neglect historical context as a value-neutral vacuum, but as a group of people whose relations are influenced by the mode of production of material life. In a civilized society, an individual is shaped by the contradictions between the needs of the inner world and the inherent needs in the process of reproduction of material and cultural production. The result of the contradiction is not the individualization of the mode of reproduction of the material and cultural production but the means by which the individual becomes a lifestyle. In this process, the individual is not completely passive, individual motivation is manifested in the individual or choose to dehumanize personality, save the body; or choose to save the individual, the elimination of physical. Tess’s acquaintance, the professional process of raising poultry and milking milk, and the political, economic and cultural separations that left the Jauree home, revealed the truth and personally killed Ariel’s individual cognitive processes, demonstrated lifestyles and their mutual ablation The individual’s influence indicates that the contradiction between the needs of the inner world of the individual and the inherent needs in the process of reproduction of material and cultural production is the root cause of the tragedy.