论文部分内容阅读
通过区分圣凡未别与有别,并引入科尔斯戈德教授对规范性来源问题的讨论,不难发现荀子在礼之为规范性来源问题上的主张:圣凡有别后,荀子持的是唯意志论的观点,后者之所以可能,是因为圣人所制之礼是出于理性而符合人类福祉的;而圣凡未别时,荀子的立场较为复杂,他既强调反思性认可的维度,后者通过心、性等个体内在意识的活动体现,又通过区分可以与可能突出强调了社会历史文化在道德规范性来源问题上的根本意义。而通过科尔斯戈德与荀子的对话,亦能发现他们在规范性来源问题上的所见与所蔽。
By distinguishing St. Vincent from the others and introducing the discussion of the normative sources by Professor Coleslaw, it is not difficult to find Xunzi’s proposition on the subject of nurishment as a normative source: Is a voluntaristic view, the latter is possible because the gift of the sage is rational and in line with human well-being; while Xunzi’s position is more complicated when the holy place is not, he emphasizes reflective approval The latter is manifested through the activities of inner individual consciousness such as heart and sex, and by distinguishing between them, the fundamental significance of social history and culture on the source of moral norms can be highlighted. Through the dialogue between Coles Gold and Xun Zi, they can also find out what they saw and what they said about the origin of normative origin.