论文部分内容阅读
目的对宫颈息肉摘除术与宫腔镜下切除术式术后复发进行比较,阐述宫颈息肉用宫腔镜治疗的优势。方法对212例确诊宫颈息肉的患者随机分为两组,分别用盲摘法摘除与宫腔镜切除术式。结果用盲摘法摘除1年后的复发率38.1%,用宫腔镜切除1年后的复发率1.87%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。宫腔镜能发现肉眼不能发现的息肉,诊断率大大提高。结论宫腔镜在宫颈息肉的诊断及治疗方面有较大优势,在临床上具有广泛的应用价值。
Objective To compare the postoperative recurrence of cervical polyp excision and hysteroscopic excision to explain the advantages of hysteroscopy in treating cervical polyps. Methods A total of 212 patients with diagnosed cervical polyps were randomly divided into two groups, respectively, with blind pick method and hysteroscopic resection. Results The relapse rate was 38.1% 1 year after removal of blindness, and 1.87% after 1 year of hysteroscopic resection. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). Hysteroscopy can detect the polyps can not be found in the naked eye, the diagnosis rate increased significantly. Conclusion Hysteroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical polyps have greater advantages in clinical practice has a wide range of applications.