论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨陆军士兵自尊水平、应对方式的状况及两者的关系。方法采用随机抽样方法,从某军区5个陆军单位抽取士兵507名,使用自尊量表(SES)和应对方式问卷(CSQ)进行测查。结果陆军士兵的自尊水平在不同年龄组上存在显著差异(F=3.207,P<0.05);家庭经济状况一般组的自尊水平、解决问题方式显著高于贫困组(t=2.157,P<0.05;t=2.507,P<0.05);担任骨干组士兵的自尊水平显著高于非骨干组(t=3.700,P<0.001)。在不同学历上,士兵在自责、求助以及合理化因子上的得分存在显著差异(F=3.560,P<0.05;F=3.169,P<0.05;F=4.317,P<0.05)。自尊水平与解决问题、求助呈显著正相关(r=0.459,P<0.001;r=0.353,P<0.001),与自责、幻想、退避、合理化呈显著负相关(r=-0.471,P<0.001;r=-0.316,P<0.001;r=-0.381,P<0.001;r=-0.267,P<0.001)。结论陆军士兵的自尊水平在年龄、家庭经济状况上差异显著;其应对方式在学历、是否担任骨干上差异显著,二者具有显著的相关性。
Objective To explore the status of army soldiers’ self-esteem, coping styles and their relationship. Methods Using random sampling method, 507 soldiers were taken from 5 army units of a certain military region, and the self-esteem scale (SES) and coping style questionnaire (CSQ) were used for testing. Results There was a significant difference in self-esteem level of Army soldiers in different age groups (F = 3.207, P <0.05). The level of self-esteem and problem-solving in the general family economy group were significantly higher than those in the poor group (t = 2.157, P < t = 2.507, P <0.05). The level of self-esteem in the backbone group was significantly higher than that in the non-backbone group (t = 3.700, P <0.001). There were significant differences in scores of self-criticism, help seeking and rationalization among different academic qualifications (F = 3.560, P <0.05; F = 3.169, P <0.05; F = 4.317, P <0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between the level of self-esteem and problem solving and help seeking (r = -0.471, P <0.001; r = 0.353, P <0.001) 0.001; r = -0.316, P <0.001; r = -0.381, P <0.001; r = -0.267, P <0.001). Conclusion The level of self-esteem of army soldiers is significantly different in their age and family economic status. The coping styles of the soldiers are significantly different in qualifications and whether they hold the key positions or not.