论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨对肺结核早期患者应用两种检验方法的临床诊断效果,评价其价值。方法选取2013年7月-2015年7月我院收治的60例肺结核早期患者,按检测方法不同分为观察组(30例,痰涂片结核菌检验),对照组(30例,抗原胶体金法检验),对比两组患者的临床诊断效果。结果观察组的检测阳性率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经ROC分析,两种检验方法均具有诊断价值(P<0.05),痰涂片结核菌检验的诊断价值更加显著。结论与抗原胶体金法相比,采用痰涂片结核菌检验肺结核早期患者的灵敏性、诊断价值更高,可为临床制定合理的治疗方案提供科学依据。
Objective To explore the clinical diagnosis of two kinds of test methods in patients with early stage pulmonary tuberculosis and to evaluate their value. Methods Sixty patients with early stage of pulmonary tuberculosis admitted to our hospital from July 2013 to July 2015 were divided into observation group (30 cases, sputum smear test of tuberculosis), control group (30 cases of antigen colloidal gold France test), compared the clinical diagnosis of two groups of patients. Results The positive rate of detection in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P <0.05). The ROC analysis showed that both methods had diagnostic value (P <0.05), and the diagnosis of sputum smear TB test The value is more significant. Conclusion Compared with the antigen colloidal gold method, the sputum smear test of tuberculosis in patients with early detection of the sensitivity of the tuberculosis, the diagnostic value is higher, which can provide a scientific basis for the development of a reasonable clinical treatment plan.