《邹忌讽齐王纳谏》(下简称《讽谏》)一文,不少读者读如史传,似乎历史上的邹忌真是一位善于“讽谏”的贤臣,齐威王真是一位虚心“纳谏”的明君。其实,这完全是历史的误会。“讽谏”之事,子虚乌有,《讽谏》一文,出于“拟托”(缪文远《战国策考辨》)①。这一点,从下列三个方面可以概见。 首先,《讽谏》一文与先秦寓言如出一辙。 《吕氏春秋·达郁》载下面一则寓言: 列精子高听行于齐湣王,善衣东布衣,白缟冠,颡推之履,特会朝雨,祛步堂下。谓其侍者曰:“我何若?”侍者 In the article “Zou Jiong satirizing the King” (hereafter referred to as “Satire”), many readers read such as historical biography. It seems that Zou Jin in history is really an admirer who is good at “irony,” and Qiwei Wang is really an open minded person.谏 “The Ming Jun. In fact, this is entirely a misunderstanding of history. ”Caricature“ thing, nothing is true, ”Caricature“ article, out of the ”to be care“ (Yu Wenyuan ”Warring State Policy Examination“) 1. This point can be summarized from the following three aspects. First of all, the article ”Satire“ is similar to the pre-Qin fables. ”Lu’s Spring and Autumn Dao Yu“ contains the following parable: The list of high-level sperm to listen to the King of Qi, the commoner of the clothing, the white crown, the push of the shoe, the special will toward the rain, step down the hall. The waiter said: ”Why should I?" Waiter