论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨决策板在子宫肌瘤住院患者中应用的临床意义。方法:作者设计了一种工具,称为“决策板”,通过它向子宫肌瘤住院患者传递相关的医学信息,然后由医生和患者共同商议后再选择术式。采用前瞻性研究方法随机将140例绝经前的子宫肌瘤住院患者分为两组,研究组进行决策板管理,对照组进行常规术前谈话,比较出院时两组患者的满意度及所采取的4种术式的比率。结果:研究组90％的患者认为决策板易理解,96％的患者认为此项措施有助于手术方案的选择,患者满意度调查结果为:非常不满意、不满意、一般、满意、非常满意分别占1.43％（1/70）、2.86％（2/70）、28.57％（20/70）、47.14％（33/70）、20.00％（14/70）;对照组患者满意度调查结果为:非常不满意、不满意、一般、满意、非常满意分别占1.43％（1/70）、8.57％（6/70）、47.14％（33/70）、35.71％（25/70）、7.14％（5/70）。两组差异有显著性（P<0.05）。研究组中选择全子宫切除术、次全子宫切除术、子宫肌瘤挖除术、腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术的比率分别为:64.3％、8.6％、21.4％、5.7％;对照组中选择全子宫切除术、次全子宫切除术、子宫肌瘤挖除术、腹腔镜筋膜内子宫切除术分别为:81.4％、4.3％、10.0％、4.3％。两组差异无显著性（P>0.05）。结论:将决?
Objective: To explore the clinical significance of the application of decision board in hospitalized patients with uterine fibroids. METHODS: The authors devised a tool, called a “decision board,” through which medical information is transmitted to inpatients with uterine fibroids and then negotiated by physicians and patients before opting for surgery. A prospective study was conducted to randomly divide 140 premenopausal women with uterine leiomyoma into two groups. The study group was managed by a decision-making board, and the control group was given routine preoperative conversations. The satisfaction of the two groups of patients at the time of discharge and the 4 kinds of surgical ratio. RESULTS: Ninety percent of the patients in the study group felt that the decision board was easy to understand. Ninety-six percent thought the measure would be helpful for the selection of surgical options. The results of the patient satisfaction survey were: Very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, general, satisfied, very satisfied Accounting for 1.43% (1/70), 2.86% (2/70), 28.57% (20/70), 47.14% (33/70) and 20.00% (14/70) respectively. The control group patients’ satisfaction survey results were : Very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, general, satisfied, highly satisfied accounted for 1.43% (1/70), 8.57% (6/70), 47.14% (33/70), 35.71% (25/70), 7.14% (5/70). The difference between the two groups was significant (P <0.05). In the study group, the rates of hysterectomy, subtotal hysterectomy, uterine myoma excision and laparoscopic hysterectomy were 64.3%, 8.6%, 21.4% and 5.7% respectively. In the control group Select hysterectomy, subtotal hysterectomy, uterine fibroids, laparoscopic intrafascial hysterectomy were: 81.4%, 4.3%, 10.0%, 4.3%. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Will be resolved?