论文部分内容阅读
强制医疗包含着双重目的,公益保护和社会防卫。就前者而言,强制医疗在于保护处于弱势群体的精神障碍者;就后者来说,强制医疗是为了防止精神障碍者危害社会而限制其人身自由的一项制度。如果二者得到平衡,那么强制医疗就实现了它的价值和意义,但是如果这种平衡被打破,那么无论对于社会公众还是精神障碍者,这都将是一种危险。对比国外立法,我国在强制医疗的司法审查方面依然存在巨大不足。那么,国外在强制医疗方面有哪些值得借鉴的立法经验呢?
Compulsory medical treatment includes the dual purpose of public welfare protection and social defense. In the former case, compulsory medical treatment is to protect persons with mental disorders who are in a disadvantaged group. In the latter case, compulsory medical treatment is a system that limits the freedom of the person to be protected against mental disorders. If the two are balanced, then compulsory treatment achieves its value and significance, but if the balance is broken, then it will be a danger for both the general public and the mentally handicapped. Compared with foreign legislation, there is still a huge shortage of judicial review of compulsory medical treatment in our country. So, foreign countries in compulsory medical treatment which is worth learning from the legislative experience?