论文部分内容阅读
当今世界有两种主要的治理思维:主体性和主体间性。两种不同的思维导致了不同的国家建构与治理模式,并产生了不同的效果。主体性思维在现代主权国家的建构中曾起过非常积极的作用,但却存在着民族同化主义和分裂主义的危险;而主体间性思维在国家治理中对维护少数民族的集体权利和促进国家的族际整合具有积极作用。民族区域自治制度是主体间性法治思维下的制度设计,其在中国的成功实践为多民族国家的治理提供了一种有效范式。
There are two main types of governance thinking in the world today: subjectivity and intersubjectivity. Two different kinds of thinking led to different modes of national construction and governance and had different effects. Subjectivity thinking has played a very positive role in the construction of modern sovereign states, but it is at risk of national assimilationism and separatism. In inter-subjectivity thinking, inter-subjectivity thinking is very important in safeguarding the collective rights of ethnic minorities and promoting national The inter-ethnic integration has an active role. The system of regional autonomy of ethnic minorities is the institutional design under the principle of intersubjectivity by law and its successful practice in China provides an effective paradigm for the governance of multi-ethnic countries.