论文部分内容阅读
目的对甲状腺癌与甲状腺良性结节的多普勒超声诊断差异进行对比分析。方法经病理诊断的甲状腺癌(甲状腺癌组)和甲状腺良性结节(甲状腺良性结节组)患者各40例作为研究对象,所有患者均进行多普勒超声诊断,诊断结束后,对比两组的诊断差异。结果甲状腺癌组的动脉峰值流速、阻力指数均高于甲状腺良性结节组(P<0.05);甲状腺癌组的分支型、穿入型例数多于甲状腺良性结节组(P<0.05);甲状腺癌组的Ⅲ、Ⅳ级血流丰富程度例数多于甲状腺良性结节组的Ⅲ、Ⅳ级血流丰富程度例数(P<0.05)。结论甲状腺癌与甲状腺良性结节的多普勒超声诊断结果存在明显的差异,在临床过程中可采用多普勒超声进行区分诊断。
Objective To compare the differences of diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma and benign thyroid nodules by Doppler echocardiography. Methods Forty patients with thyroid cancer (thyroid cancer) and benign thyroid nodules (benign thyroid nodules) diagnosed by pathology were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent Doppler sonography. After the diagnosis was completed, Diagnose the difference. Results The peak arterial flow velocity and resistance index of thyroid cancer group were higher than that of benign thyroid nodule group (P <0.05). The number of thyroid carcinoma group was more than that of benign thyroid nodule group (P <0.05). Thyroid cancer group Ⅲ, Ⅳ level of blood flow is more than the number of cases of benign thyroid nodules Ⅲ, Ⅳ level of blood flow in the number of cases (P <0.05). Conclusions Doppler ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid cancer and benign thyroid nodules have obvious difference. Doppler ultrasound can be used to distinguish the diagnosis.