论文部分内容阅读
康德哲学的悖论是一种看的条件与两种存在之间的矛盾。康德始终坚持直观即是对象的原理,没有直观条件的对象是不存在的。但对于物自体,康德只是说它不可认识,并没有否认它的存在;而且充分肯定了它在伦理、道德领域的功能和作用。物自体是存在的,但却没有相应的直观条件;因为康德只有一种看的条件,即感性直观。只有感性直观构成的现象界才是存在的,概念、范畴也只有通过感性直观才能产生关于事物的真知识。物自体存在着,但却又在感性直观条件之外;这直接违反了康德自己坚持的直观即是对象的原理。面对这一矛盾,康德同样始终纠缠于两种存在、两种对象之间的矛盾悖论,却忽略了对直观条件本身的批判,而这刚好启示出人的另一种看,即现象学式的本质直观。
The paradox of Kant’s philosophy is the contradiction between the conditions of seeing and the existence of two kinds. Kant always adhere to the principle of intuitive is the object, the object does not exist without intuitive conditions. But for the thing itself, Kant just said that it can not recognize and did not deny its existence; and fully affirmed its function and role in the field of ethics and morality. Existence of the thing itself, but there is no corresponding intuitive conditions; Because Kant only one kind of conditions to see, that is, sensual and intuitive. Only phenomenal boundaries formed by perceptual intuition exist, and concepts and categories can only produce true knowledge about things through perceptual intuition. The thing itself exists, but it is outside the perceptual and intuitive conditions; this is a direct violation of the principle that Kant himself insisted on being intuitive and object. In the face of this contradiction, Kant also always dwells on two kinds of existence and paradoxes of paradoxes between two kinds of objects, but ignores the critique of the intuitive conditions themselves, which just reveals another view of human being, namely phenomenology The nature of the type of intuitive.