论文部分内容阅读
1999年9月,张家口市阳光报业服务有限公司在“百种期刊,上门征订,投递到户,不怕楼高”的承诺声中挂牌开张。张家口市邮政局认为,阳光报业有限公司此举是一种擅自进行邮发报刊征订违法侵权行为。2001年4月26日,张家口市邮政局向阳光报业正式下达了行政处罚决定书,给予阳光报业警告和罚款2.98万元的行政处罚。阳光报业对处罚不服,于2001年5月下旬将张家口市邮政局告上了法庭。河北省张家口市桥东区人民法院对张家口市阳光报业服务有限公司状告张家口市邮政局案作出一审判决:维持张家口市邮政局[2001]第1号河北省邮政通信行政案件处罚决定,本案的诉讼费100元由原告承担。尽管“阳光报业案”一审原告张家口阳光报业败诉,但此案涉及的问题复杂,社会各界对此反应强烈。那么未来中国邮政产业应该形成什么样的市场结构呢。就此本刊记者采访了北京天则经济研究所理事长茅于轼老先生。
In September 1999, Zhangjiakou Sunshine Press Service Co., Ltd. was listed in the promises of “100 kinds of journals, door-to-door collection, delivery to households, not afraid of the floor”. Zhangjiakou City Post Office believes that the Sunshine Press Co., Ltd. move is a unauthorized newspaper and magazines subscription violations of infringement. April 26, 2001, Zhangjiakou City Post Office formally issued a letter to the Sunshine Press administrative penalty decision, giving the Sunshine newspaper industry fined 29,000 yuan and a fine of administrative penalties. Sunshine newspaper on the punishment dissatisfied, in late May 2001 Zhangjiakou City Post Office sued the court. Qiaodong District People’s Court of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province, sued Zhangjiakou Sunshine Press Service Co., Ltd. for the first instance verdict of Zhangjiakou Post Bureau: to uphold the punishment decision of Zhangjiakou Post Office [2001] No. 1 Hebei Post Communications Administrative Case and the lawsuit of this case 100 yuan fee by the plaintiff. Although “Sunshine Newspaper ” the first instance plaintiff Zhangjiakou Sunshine Press lost, but the case involved a complex problem, all sectors of society responded strongly. So what kind of market structure should China’s postal industry form in the future? This correspondents interviewed Mao Tian, chairman of the Beijing Institute of Economics Mao Yushi.