行政违法中的欺诈行为与民事欺诈行为构成要件不同,构成行政违法中的欺诈行为则仅需行为人有欺诈的故意、欺诈的行为及违反行政法上禁止性规定这三个要件,并不需要具备相对人陷入错误并基于错误而为意思表示。二者在认定的法律依据上也存在不同。文章以具体案件作为研究对象,通过对案件的分析,来认定行政违法中的欺诈行为与民事欺诈行为的区分标准。 The fraudulent acts in administrative illegalities are different from the constitutional elements of civil fraud. The fraudulent acts that constitute the administrative illegalities need only the three elements of intentional fraud, fraud and violation of the prohibition of administrative law, and do not need Have relatives fall into the wrong and based on the wrong meaning. There are also differences in legal basis between the two. The article takes the specific case as the research object, and through the analysis of the case, finds the distinction standard between the fraud and the civil fraud in the administrative violation.