论文部分内容阅读
在刑事诉讼的过程中,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的重复自白时有发生,目前我国对于重复自白可采性的法律规定并不明确。重复自白能否被采纳的关键在于之前的非法取证行为是否对后来自白的任意性造成了影响,通过对非法取证行为的严重程度、重复自白与其他证据的印证程度、证据污染的稀释程度等方面的综合考量,在有证据证明第一次非法取证行为不会严重干扰后续自白任意性的前提下,可以将重复自白作为证据采用。
In the process of criminal procedure, the confession of criminal suspects and defendants sometimes occurs. At present, the legal provisions in our country that repeat the confessability are not clear. Whether the repeated confession can be adopted lies in whether the previous illegal forensics behavior has an impact on the arbitrariness of the later confession. Through the degree of the illegal act of taking evidence, the degree of concluding confession with other evidence and the degree of dilution of evidence pollution, etc. Of the comprehensive consideration, there is evidence that the first illegal forensics behavior will not seriously interfere with the follow-up confession arbitrariness premise, you can repeat the confession as evidence.