论文部分内容阅读
纠纷长期存在,纠纷的解决便成了人类永恒的话题。人类通过其自觉或者不自觉的行为,构造了不同的规范体系:国家正式立法与习惯。于是便形成了不同的纠纷解决机制,用通俗的语言来说即“公了”与“私了”。本文通过经济学上的成本——收益分析,得出如下结论:由于社会存在矛盾与纠纷,并且它们不同的解决机制也是一种实然的社会现象与存在,更有国家制度效力发挥的不充分,必然会在制度内的纠纷解决机制运行时,留下空白或者“鞭长莫及”的地方,而制度外的纠纷解决方式就应该在它们的效用范围内得到应有的尊重与承认。
Dispute long-standing dispute resolution has become the eternal topic of mankind. Through their conscious or unconscious behavior, human beings have constructed different normative systems: the formal national legislation and custom. So they formed a different dispute resolution mechanism, in plain language that is “public ” and “private ”. Based on the economics cost-benefit analysis, this paper draws the following conclusion: Because of the existence of contradictions and disputes in society, and their different settlement mechanisms are also a real social phenomenon and existence, more inadequate effect of national system to play , It is bound to leave gaps or “beyond reach” in the operation of the dispute resolution mechanism within the system. Disputes settlement methods outside the system should be respected and acknowledged within the scope of their effectiveness.