两位临床医师就目前的病人监护设备和方法这一问题提出了他们的观点。他们认为监护仪器应该具有较高的准确性、稳定性和安全性,能迅速感觉/测量并以某种快速方式向观察者报告,不影响其它相应的治疗、观察和测量,而且还具有易于掌握使用,便于存放、运输和清理等特点。第一位是麻醉医师,他认为:尽管监护仪器和广泛应用新技术产品已使常规麻醉工作有所改进,但它们不能取代细致的、严格认真的临床观察,其实际作用和使用这些仪器的人员一样。该医师反对由那些诸如保险公司那样的不会给麻醉药的人员根据监护仪器开处方的做法;第二位临床医师深深地体会到了现行监护设备所带来的益处,但同样认为监护仪器不能取代细致的临床观察,他强调指出:使用先进的监护设 The two clinicians put forward their views on the current patient monitoring equipment and methods. They believe that monitoring instruments should have high accuracy, stability and safety, be able to feel / measure quickly and report to the observer in some quick manner, without affecting other appropriate treatments, observations and measurements, but with easy-to-grasp Use, easy to store, transport and clean and so on. The first is an anesthesiologist, who argues that while monitoring instruments and the widespread use of new technological products have improved conventional anesthesia, they can not replace the careful and rigorous clinical observation of their actual role and the personnel who use them same. The physician objected to the prescription of caregivers by those who would not give the anesthetic to drugs, such as insurance companies; the second clinician was deeply aware of the benefits of current monitoring equipment but also considered that the monitoring device could not Instead of careful clinical observation, he emphasized: the use of advanced guardianship facilities