论文部分内容阅读
观察了248例住院患儿,治疗组(锌)85例,对照组(复方布洛芬散)79例,联合组(二药合用)84例。三组治疗前病情无显著性差异(P>0.05);治疗结果:发生降温时,治疗组比对照组慢(P>0.05);但体温复升率明显低于对照组(P<0.01)。完全降温时、累计发热时、病程等,治疗组与对照组无显著性差异(P>0.05)。联合用药时,以上三项指标均较治疗组及对照组缩短(P<0.01)。提示葡萄糖酸锌对上感的治疗作用可能在于病源方面。合用解热药品,疗效更好。
A total of 248 hospitalized children were enrolled, including 85 cases of treatment group (zinc), 79 cases of control group (compound Ibuprofen powder) and 84 cases of combination group (combination of two drugs). There was no significant difference between the three groups before treatment (P> 0.05). Treatment results: When the temperature was lowered, the treatment group was slower than the control group (P> 0.05); but the rate of body temperature rise was significantly lower than that of the control group (P <0.01). Complete cooling, cumulative fever, duration, treatment group and control group no significant difference (P> 0.05). Combination therapy, the above three indicators were shorter than the treatment group and the control group (P <0.01). Tip zinc gluconate on the therapeutic effect may be in the pathogen. Combination of antipyretic drugs, better efficacy.