作为一门着眼于学生发展的新型课程,综合实践活动课程与其他课程一样,需要评价来判定学生是否在课程学习期间取得了进步与发展。但在实践进程中,由于受传统的课程评价的制约,许多教师会有两种极端的观点:一是不需要评价。认为综合实践活动课程非考试科目,则认为该课程就不需要评价;二是不能用正确的评价方式。认为综合实践活动课程进入常态化实施领域,关键就取决于其是否能如语文、数学学科那样能在纳入期末试卷考试范畴。笔者以 As a new course focused on student development, the Integrated Practice Activity Courses, like any other course, needs evaluations to determine whether students have made progress and progress during the course of study. However, in practice, due to the constraints of traditional curriculum evaluation, many teachers have two extreme views: First, no evaluation is needed. Think comprehensive practice activities courses non-subject, that the course does not need evaluation; the second is not the right way to evaluate. That integrated practice courses into the implementation of the normalization of the field, the key depends on whether it can, as language, mathematics, as included in the final exam area. The author