论文部分内容阅读
苏联《科学技术革命》杂志对科学家兼职过多的现象发表评论,现摘要转载如下: 在许多灾难中,垄断是主要灾难之一。科学上的垄断是靠强力方法歪曲某个研究领域正常发展的一种现象。当然,“强力方法”的表现形式在每个具体情况下可能不同。但不管垄断的“强力外框”多么不同,它的基础是缺乏健康的科学竞争,在通过决定时公开性不够,以及在科学组织方面忽视民主性。当然,在科学垄断条件下也可能有竞争,有时甚至是严格的竞争,但全部斗争是发生在一个科学“教区”内部,是在“自己人”之间进行的,科学首领可以不断对斗争进行“修正”。科学首领利用科学组织杠杆,在许多科学领域的鉴定委员会和组织委员会内任命“自己的人”,任命最重要杂志的主编和研究所所长。结果形成了这样一种制度,使首领一个人以最有效方法控制一个,有时是许多个现代科学领域的发展。
The Soviet Union, “Science and Technology Revolution” magazine comment on the phenomenon of excessive part-time scientists, now summarized as follows: In many disasters, monopoly is one of the major disasters. The monopoly of science is a phenomenon that distorts the normal development of a research field by powerful means. Of course, the manifestations of “superficial methods” may differ in each particular case. But no matter how different the “brute-force” framework of monopoly is, it is based on a lack of healthy scientific competition, inadequate openness in the adoption of decisions, and neglect of democracy in scientific organizations. Of course, there may be competition and sometimes even strict competition under the conditions of scientific monopoly. However, all the struggle takes place within the “parish” of science and between “one's own people,” and scientific leaders can keep fighting “Fixed.” Scientific leaders use the leverage of scientific organizations to appoint “their own people” in appraisal committees and organizational committees in many scientific fields, and to appoint chief editor and director of the most important magazines. As a result, a system was created that enabled the leader to control one, and sometimes many, developments in the field of modern science in the most effective way.